[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Testing removal summary 2006-09-09 (Saturday)



The following source package(s) have been removed from testing:

  REMOVED: i2c 1:2.10.0-1
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
    # 20060830; done 20060905
    Bug #350098: kernel-source-2.4.27: FTBFS with current kernel-package: config fails
    # oh, and totally obsolete for etch.  just needs lm-sensors in.

The following package(s) appear to have valid removal hints,
but are still in testing for some reason:

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: cfengine 1.6.5-2
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/aba>
    #20060908
    Bug #332433: cfengine: Security fixes from DSA-835 missing in sid
    Bug #311188: debian-edu-config: Messes "programmatically" with conffiles of other packages

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: debian-edu-config 0.397
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/aba>
    #20060908
    Bug #332433: cfengine: Security fixes from DSA-835 missing in sid
    Bug #311188: debian-edu-config: Messes "programmatically" with conffiles of other packages

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: debian-edu-install 0.652
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/aba>
    #20060908
    Bug #332433: cfengine: Security fixes from DSA-835 missing in sid
    Bug #311188: debian-edu-config: Messes "programmatically" with conffiles of other packages

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: dpsyco 1.0.31
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/aba>
    #20060908
    Bug #332433: cfengine: Security fixes from DSA-835 missing in sid
    Bug #311188: debian-edu-config: Messes "programmatically" with conffiles of other packages

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: gnutls11 1.0.16-14
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
    # 20060830
    Bug #370429: [tracker bug] Let's remove gnutls11 from sid/etch
    # almost ready to get rid of gnutls11, yay!

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; henning@makholm.net is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.



Reply to: