Testing removal summary 2005-12-13 (Tuesday)
The following source package(s) have been removed from testing:
REMOVED: mecab 0.80-2
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20051207; done 20051213
Bug #339230: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
REMOVED: mecab-jumandic 4.0+0.77-1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20051207; done 20051213
Bug #339230: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
The following package(s) appear to have valid removal hints,
but are still in testing for some reason:
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: efax-gtk 3.0.4-1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20051212
Bug #334759: efax-gtk: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: libintl.h:40: error: new declaration 'char* gettext(const char*)'
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: mysql-admin 1.1.4-2
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20051212
Bug #342728: mysql-admin: not installable in sid
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: mysql-query-browser 1.1.17-2
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20051212
Bug #343166: mysql-query-browser: needs rebuild because not binNMU-safe
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: ndiswrapper-modules-i386 1.1-2
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/djpig>
# 20051028
Bug #323742: FTBFS: Unable to find gcc-3.3
# ndiswrapper-utils is rdepends...
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: nedit 1:5.5-1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/djpig>
# 20051022
Bug #318261: nedit: does not start up after installing xserver-xorg (x opcode failure)
# junior-writing as rdepends...
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: pychm 0.8.2-3
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20051211
Bug #343065: pychm: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency on chmlib-dev
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: skkdic 20040323-1.1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/djpig>
# lets get this moving, #272127
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: xawtv 3.94-1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/djpig>
# 20051028
Bug #330084: xawtv-plugin-qt: segfaults on start recording
# rdepends kvdr, wmtv
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.
--
This email is automatically generated; henning@makholm.net is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
Reply to: