Re: OmniORB 2.7.0 *MUST* be moved into stable
>>>>> "Ben" == Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org> writes:
Ben> Adam Di Carlo told me to mention this to the testing group:
Ben> OmniORB 2.5.0-5, as shipped with slink, has a very visible bug in
Ben> that it ships its libraries as either copies or hardlinks (I
Ben> forget which) instead of symlinks, as they should be.
Ben> As a result, ldconfig whines every time it's run, making a very
Ben> visible and nasty-looking Debian install. This is fixed in 2.7.0
Ben> (see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/32/32411.html) but it is not
Ben> in stable nor in proposed-updates.
Ben> Please have 2.7.0 moved into proposed-updates.
Wouldn't it be better, and more "frozen", to just do a 2.5.0-0.6 with
the bug fix? It doesn't seem to me that 2.7.0 in slink is really
called for.
I'm CC'ing the omniorb maintainer for thier thoughts.
I've added this info to
<URL:http://www.debian.org/~aph/slink-bugs.html>.
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-testing-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: