Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.pro> writes: > On 04/12/14 09:22, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: >> Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <odyx@debian.org> writes: >>>> To maintain the highest level of confidence in this system it is >>>> probably important to have strong attendance by local DDs at any >>>> formal meeting such as the AGM so if enough people say they can come >>>> then maybe it can be formally announced as the AGM date, before the >>>> notice deadline and if not it can just be a BSP. >>> I've put some thoughts to it, and I now tend to agree: iff the planned >>> attendance to the debian.ch AGM is too low (saturday end-of-day, 31 >>> January), we should be finding another time-space. Decoupling the AGM >>> from the BSP doesn't endanger much the BSP IMHO (and I'll be going >>> anyway :-) ). >>> >>> What do others think? >> I agree that we should find a date for the AGM where at least the "usual >> supects" can attend. I guess having an informal poll about this is the >> best way to proceed. Organizing the AGM is not that much work. So having >> it on another date is fine for me. Any volunteers to organize the AGM? > > > Does anybody else have feedback for or against Didier's AGM proposal? > If the AGM would take place on 31 January then the notice would need to > be sent out in the next few days. As nobody volunteered to organize the AGM on another date and there was no further opposition to the date proposed by Didier I think we should go with the proposed date (2014-01-31). Didier are you going to send the invitation or should I do that? Gaudenz
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature