Re: [sh4] klibc SIGILL

[Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>]

Hi,

Thank you for making it notice.
I will check about this.

Best regards,
  Nobuhiro

2012/5/19 Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>:
> Hi sh4 porters,
>
> I’ve just fixed a regression of klibc to build from source
> on sh4 using the sumotsu.debian.net porterbox (thanks for
> making one available) and found a problem with your archi-
> tecture: all binaries built with klibc (shared and static)
> get a SIGILL (illegal instruction).
>
> I suspect that different CFLAGS are needed. Please, someone,
> have a look at it; a release of klibc 2.0 upstream is
> imminent.
>
> bye,
> //mirabilos
> --
> FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought it was much
> *much* more bare bones. But it turns out it beats the living hell out of
> ksh93 in that respect. I'd even consider it for my daily use if I hadn't
> wasted half my life on my zsh setup. :-) -- Frank Terbeck in #!/bin/mksh
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-superh-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.1205181641040.23784@herc.mirbsd.org">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.1205181641040.23784@herc.mirbsd.org
>



-- 
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
   iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
   GPG ID: 40AD1FA6