Re: dpkg to support new sh architectures
Hi,
At Tue, 1 Jan 2002 14:22:34 +0100,
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously YAEGASHI Takeshi wrote:
> > It seems there is no objection against dpkg getting to support four
> > different architectures for sh. I wish to see these changes in both
> > 1.9 and 1.10 branches.
>
> commited to HEAD now. I haven't added it to the v1_9 branch since
> I highly doubt we'll make another release from that branch.
Thanks for quick response. But don't you forget this one?
Index: scripts/dpkg-architecture.pl
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/dpkg/dpkg/scripts/dpkg-architecture.pl,v
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -r1.26 dpkg-architecture.pl
--- scripts/dpkg-architecture.pl 2002/01/01 13:16:37 1.26
+++ scripts/dpkg-architecture.pl 2002/01/01 13:36:00
@@ -98,7 +98,6 @@
s/(?:i386|i486|i586|i686|pentium)(.*linux)/i386$1/;
s/ppc/powerpc/;
- s/sh[34]/sh/;
return $_;
}
And, do you mean that the next dpkg release is to be 1.10?
> > Other patches for dpkg-architecture.pl and enquiry.c should be more
> > discussed here and introduced into 1.10 branch first.
>
> Only introduced in 1.10 even, 1.9 is maintenance only.
I see. That seems reasonable to me.
--
YAEGASHI Takeshi <t@keshi.org> <takeshi@yaegashi.jp> <yaegashi@dodes.org>
Reply to: