Re: Bug#155002: SuperH supports
In the article <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
NIIBE Yutaka <email@example.com> wrote:
> In 3.0.4, we have no Fortran because of nasty reload bugs of SuperH,
> we have no Java because of lack of runtime support. Those two are
> already have been worked done nicely for 3.1.
> Forthcoming 3.2 has ABI change for C++, it would become big step for
> us. Although our test coverage status is good for 3.1 (it seems no
> regression against 3.0.4 for C) (and we have new things Java and
> Fortran) , but C++ ABI change is major change.
Then it would be nice if we could have gcc-3.1(3.2?) debs for SuperH.
Is it possible to mix up objects of gcc-3.0 and g77-3.1 or gcj-3.1?
Niibe, could you make patches agaist gcc sources in current gcc-3.1
package (1:3.1.1ds2-0pre3)? You can leave other trivial deb packaging
tasks to me.
YAEGASHI Takeshi <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>