Re: Bug#154179: Please create binary-sh and remove binary-sh
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> No, it is not same as i386 vs i686.
> Please refer the mail written by NIIBE Yutaka <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> The object and/or shared library are *not* compatible between SH3
> and SH4, so we can not mix SH3 and SH4 binary on the same environmet.
While in another mail you wrote:
> >> I'm not yet an official Debian developer (NM process in progress), but
> >> my buildd processes for sh3 and sh4 have successfully built 837 and 3365
> >> debs respectively so far. Please visit http://debian.dodes.org/.
> >> Most of them are ready to be uploaded to ftp.debian.org and become
> >> official Debian packages. Is it possbile to ask someone to sponsor the
> >> uploading?
> Of cause, I'll do this ;-)
> And I'm restarting binary-sh3/-sh4 build on my own machine.
Did you refer to "machines" (i.e. plural) or are you going to build sh4 *and*
sh3 on the same machine? In which case I wonder why the binaries won't run
on the same machine if you can build them on the same and cross-compilers
are deprecated for various reasons.
The MS-DOS filesystem is nice for removable media. -- H. Peter Anvin
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org