Re: dpkg to support new sh architectures

[YAEGASHI Takeshi <t@keshi.org>]

Hi,

At Tue, 1 Jan 2002 14:22:34 +0100,
Wichert Akkerman wrote:

> Previously YAEGASHI Takeshi wrote:
> > It seems there is no objection against dpkg getting to support four
> > different architectures for sh.  I wish to see these changes in both
> > 1.9 and 1.10 branches.
> 
> commited to HEAD now. I haven't added it to the v1_9 branch since
> I highly doubt we'll make another release from that branch.

Thanks for quick response.  But don't you forget this one?

Index: scripts/dpkg-architecture.pl
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/dpkg/dpkg/scripts/dpkg-architecture.pl,v
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -r1.26 dpkg-architecture.pl
--- scripts/dpkg-architecture.pl        2002/01/01 13:16:37     1.26
+++ scripts/dpkg-architecture.pl        2002/01/01 13:36:00
@@ -98,7 +98,6 @@
 
        s/(?:i386|i486|i586|i686|pentium)(.*linux)/i386$1/;
        s/ppc/powerpc/;
-       s/sh[34]/sh/;
        return $_;
 }


And, do you mean that the next dpkg release is to be 1.10?


> > Other patches for dpkg-architecture.pl and enquiry.c should be more
> > discussed here and introduced into 1.10 branch first.
> 
> Only introduced in 1.10 even, 1.9 is maintenance only.

I see.  That seems reasonable to me.

-- 
YAEGASHI Takeshi <t@keshi.org> <takeshi@yaegashi.jp> <yaegashi@dodes.org>