Well, it seems that there's not much interests on distinction. IMNSHO, if Debian continues having "sh" binaries, it misleads, bothers the industry, because there's no consept of "sh" binaries. Could Debian change to use the binary of "sh3" instead of bogus "sh" binaries? I don't care if Debian will have "sh4", "sh3eb" or "sh4eb" binaries. Having "sh" binaries *is* problematic. --