Re: SuperH libc ?
>>>>> In <20010811144345.A549@cyberhqz.com>
>>>>> Ryan Murray <rmurray@debian.org> wrote:
>> Hi, I was just wondering when an arch-sh libc will make it into the archive?
>> All sh packages are currently uninstallable without it...
Sorry, I understand it. But some important packages are not uploaded
yet because of....
Toolchains:
We does not have toolchains.deb package (gcc_sh.deb and
binutils_sh.deb). Current released toolchains does not have
SuperH support enough. We should back port from current gcc CVS
to gcc 3.0 branch or should make gcc-current-cvs_sh.deb.
Currenty we use toolchains tar ball (this is made by SuperH hacker
TAKESHI Yaegashi <t@keshi.org>).
ftp.m17n.org:/pub/super-h/debian-unstable/superh/tar+gz
binutils_010501-1_sh3.tar.gz, gcc_3.1.010501-3_sh3.tar.gz,
libstdc++-v3_3.1.010501-3_sh3.tar.gz
kernel-image:
Not sh.deb package was made.
glibc:
To build glibc2 package for binary-sh need some (bad?) tric TAKESHI
said (I don't know detail). So we should make patch for it, But is
not made it. glibc2_sh.deb is unofficialy exists (and we use it)
ftp.m17n.org:/pub/super-h/debian-unstable/superh/deb/
XFree86:
XFree86 4.1.0 does not support GNU/Linux SuperH. But current XFree86
CVS head includes SuperH support (I've posted the patch and it was
merged few days ago). We should back port this to current
xfree86_4.1.0 package. I plan to do this among several weeks after
this.
And Of cause many many packages missing, Not enough human resource..:
Almost all uploaded binary-sh packages ware compiled me alone.
(on two Dreamcast and one Jornada690). And I don't have enough
time for binary-sh. Those who can do work about binary-sh port,
please contact me.
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<ishikawa@linux.or.jp>, <ishikawa@debian.org>, <ishikawa@redhat.com>
Reply to: