[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: Distinguish of SH3 and SH4

It may be a problem at the kernel level, I think.
Debian's arch is a mirror of the kernel's arch.

BTW, who is the debian developer responsible for
the sh architecture?  We can always bring the 
question to the -devel mailing list for advice.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: NIIBE Yutaka [mailto:gniibe@m17n.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 4:10 PM
> To: debian-superh@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Distinguish of SH3 and SH4
> Well, it seems that there's not much interests on distinction.
> IMNSHO, if Debian continues having "sh" binaries, it misleads, bothers
> the industry, because there's no consept of "sh" binaries.
> Could Debian change to use the binary of "sh3" instead of bogus "sh"
> binaries?  I don't care if Debian will have "sh4", "sh3eb" or "sh4eb"
> binaries.  Having "sh" binaries *is* problematic.
> -- 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-superh-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact 
> listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: