Bug#1095922: openssh-server: sshd -T still show a deprecated alias: without-password
Package: openssh-server
Version: 1:9.9p1-3
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Currently, here is what sshd says on my system:
$ grep -i root /etc/ssh/sshd_config ; echo "---" ; sshd -V ; sshd -T | grep -i
root
#PermitRootLogin prohibit-password
# the setting of "PermitRootLogin prohibit-password".
#ChrootDirectory none
---
OpenSSH_9.9p1 Debian-3, OpenSSL 3.4.1 11 Feb 2025
permitrootlogin without-password
chrootdirectory none
Regarding https://man.openbsd.org/sshd_config#PermitRootLogin, the default is:
prohibit-password
and not its deprecated alias:
without-password
Could this be an oversight?
Regards,
Patrice
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 6.12.13-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages openssh-server depends on:
ii adduser 3.137
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.89
ii init-system-helpers 1.68
ii libaudit1 1:4.0.2-2+b1
ii libc6 2.40-6
ii libcom-err2 1.47.2-1
ii libcrypt1 1:4.4.38-1
ii libgssapi-krb5-2 1.21.3-4
ii libkrb5-3 1.21.3-4
ii libpam-modules 1.7.0-3
ii libpam-runtime 1.7.0-3
ii libpam0g 1.7.0-3
ii libselinux1 3.8-3
ii libssl3t64 3.4.1-1
ii libwrap0 7.6.q-35
ii openssh-client 1:9.9p1-3
ii openssh-sftp-server 1:9.9p1-3
ii procps 2:4.0.4-7
ii runit-helper 2.16.4
ii sysvinit-utils [lsb-base] 3.14-1
ii ucf 3.0049
ii zlib1g 1:1.3.dfsg+really1.3.1-1+b1
Versions of packages openssh-server recommends:
ii libpam-systemd [logind] 257.2-3
ii ncurses-term 6.5+20250125-2
ii xauth 1:1.1.2-1.1
Versions of packages openssh-server suggests:
pn molly-guard <none>
pn monkeysphere <none>
pn ssh-askpass <none>
pn ufw <none>
-- debconf information excluded
Reply to: