Bug#1053555: openssh-server: DebianBanner setting not shown in configuration dump
Package: openssh-server
Version: 1:8.4p1-5+deb11u1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
'sshd -T', and since v9.3 also 'sshd -G', is supposed to print the
full, effective configuration. However, debian-banner.patch neglects
to update dump_config(), so there's no line showing the effective
value of the debianbanner setting.
I think the fix is as simple as adding
dump_cfg_fmtint(sDebianBanner, o->debian_banner);
somewhere appropriate in dump_config().
IOW,
sshd -T | grep ^debianbanner
produces nothing, but I'd expect it (in the default Debian
configuration) to print
debianbanner yes
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.7
APT prefers oldstable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable-security'),
(500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-25-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE
not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/bash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages openssh-server depends on:
ii adduser 3.118
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.77
ii dpkg 1.20.12
ii libaudit1 1:3.0-2
ii libc6 2.31-13+deb11u7
ii libcom-err2 1.46.2-2
ii libcrypt1 1:4.4.18-4
ii libgssapi-krb5-2 1.18.3-6+deb11u3
ii libkrb5-3 1.18.3-6+deb11u3
ii libpam-modules 1.4.0-9+deb11u1
ii libpam-runtime 1.4.0-9+deb11u1
ii libpam0g 1.4.0-9+deb11u1
ii libselinux1 3.1-3
ii libssl1.1 1.1.1n-0+deb11u5
ii libsystemd0 247.3-7+deb11u4
ii libwrap0 7.6.q-31
ii lsb-base 11.1.0
ii openssh-client 1:8.4p1-5+deb11u1
ii openssh-sftp-server 1:8.4p1-5+deb11u1
ii procps 2:3.3.17-5
ii runit-helper 2.10.3
ii ucf 3.0043
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2+deb11u2
Versions of packages openssh-server recommends:
ii libpam-systemd [logind] 247.3-7+deb11u4
ii ncurses-term 6.2+20201114-2+deb11u1
pn xauth <none>
Versions of packages openssh-server suggests:
pn molly-guard <none>
pn monkeysphere <none>
pn ssh-askpass <none>
pn ufw <none>
-- debconf information excluded
Reply to: