[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#911974: openssh-client: please avoid shipping setuid ssh-keysign by default



Package: openssh-client
Version: 1:7.9p1-1
Severity: wishlist

/usr/lib/openssh/ssh-keysign is one of only a few setuid programs left
on a modern system.  It looks like it is *probably* relatively safe --
not enabled by default due to configurations set in
/etc/ssh/ssh_config, checking that config file early before doing much
else, etc.

however, i suspect that this file isn't used at all by most people
(host-based authentication is generally discouraged), and those admins
that do require it can probably install a separate package, or answer
a non-default debconf question, or something comparable that doesn't
leave a setuid binary on most installations.

Reducing the setuid attack surface would be nice!

         --dkg

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (200, 'unstable-debug'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.18.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages openssh-client depends on:
ii  adduser           3.118
ii  dpkg              1.19.2
ii  libc6             2.27-6
ii  libedit2          3.1-20180525-1
ii  libgssapi-krb5-2  1.16.1-1
ii  libselinux1       2.8-1+b1
ii  libssl1.1         1.1.1-1
ii  passwd            1:4.5-1.1
ii  zlib1g            1:1.2.11.dfsg-1

Versions of packages openssh-client recommends:
ii  xauth  1:1.0.10-1

Versions of packages openssh-client suggests:
pn  keychain      <none>
pn  libpam-ssh    <none>
ii  monkeysphere  0.42-2
ii  ssh-askpass   1:1.2.4.1-10

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/ssh/ssh_config changed [not included]

-- no debconf information


Reply to: