On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 04:40:04PM +0100, Andras Korn wrote: > While it looks like a good idea, it wouldn't solve my specific problem as I > can't depend on ports other than 22 being reachable by my clients. that sounds like a very exotic case, but yeah, in this case, you really need in-protocol virtual hosts. > Still, thanks for taking the time to think about it! for the idea not to get lost, my last mail is now tracked as [1] in openssh's bug tracker. [1] https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2217
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature