[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: Re: Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#732966: [openssl] Update to openssl 1.0.1e-5 renders X unusable



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 732966 src:openssh
Bug #732966 [openssh] [openssl] Update to openssl 1.0.1e-5 renders  X unusable
Bug reassigned from package 'openssh' to 'src:openssh'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #732966 to the same values previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #732966 to the same values previously set
> forcemerge 732940 732966
Bug #732940 [src:openssh] Broken with newer OpenSSL: "OpenSSL version mismatch. Built against 1000105f, you have 10001060"
Bug #732952 [src:openssh] libssl1.0.0 1.0.1e-5 breaks ssh
Bug #732963 [src:openssh] ssh fails with OpenSSL version mismatch. Built against 1000105f, you have 10001060
Bug #732964 [src:openssh] openssh: fatal: OpenSSL version mismatch. Built against 1000105f, you have 10001060
Bug #732966 [src:openssh] [openssl] Update to openssl 1.0.1e-5 renders  X unusable
Severity set to 'critical' from 'serious'
Added indication that 732966 affects openssh,openssl,openssh-client,src:openssl,libssl1.0.0,subversion,openssh-server
Bug #732952 [src:openssh] libssl1.0.0 1.0.1e-5 breaks ssh
Bug #732963 [src:openssh] ssh fails with OpenSSL version mismatch. Built against 1000105f, you have 10001060
Bug #732964 [src:openssh] openssh: fatal: OpenSSL version mismatch. Built against 1000105f, you have 10001060
Merged 732940 732952 732963 732964 732966
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
732940: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732940
732952: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732952
732963: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732963
732964: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732964
732966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732966
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: