Re: feature request: modify getrrsetbyname() to use libunbound

[Luca Filipozzi <lfilipoz@emyr.net>]

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 04:41:32PM +1000, Darren Tucker wrote:
> OK, here's my opinion:
>  - I am OK with adding support for libunbound (we already have
>    compile-time support for an alternate resolver, ldns), however

*blush*  Should have looked at 6.0 release notes.  I'm going to give 6.0
a try now.

>  - I am oposed to a new configuration file option because
>    Portable-specific options increase the maintenance burden in both
>    directions.

See other response but may be moot given 6.0 + ldns.

> But first: why doesn't the system resolver support dnssec?  Wouldn't the
> effort be better spent fixing that instead?

Certainly.  However, there can be a lengthy delay in accomplishing this
for certain operating systems.  Again, may be moot given 6.0 + ldns.

-- 
Luca Filipozzi