[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#482025: openssh-client: Hashed keys by ssh-keyscan are not accepted by ssh client.



Package: openssh-client
Version: 1:4.3p2-9etch2
Severity: normal

Hi,

while trying to preseed my known_hosts file with keys of our servers, i
stumbled upon that

  ssh-keyscan -t rsa,dsa $TARGET,$TARGET_IP > ~/.ssh/known_hosts 
  ssh $TARGET

  (WARNING: overwrites ~/.ssh/known_hosts, use a dedicated test user!)

works just fine (don't need to confirm the hostkey of $TARGET any
more), but when creating the recommended hashed hostkeynames with 

  ssh-keyscan -H -t rsa,dsa $TARGET,$TARGET_IP > ~/.ssh/known_hosts 
  ssh $TARGET

I'm still asked by ssh to confirm the hostkey. So there seems
to be some problem with the hashing algorithm in ssh-keyscan.

Yours
Karsten


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-amd64
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages openssh-client depends on:
ii  add 3.102                                Add and remove users and groups
ii  deb 1.5.11etch1                          Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpk 1.13.25                              package maintenance system for Deb
ii  lib 2.3.6.ds1-13etch5                    GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  lib 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2etch1 common error description library
ii  lib 2.9.cvs.20050518-2.2                 BSD editline and history libraries
ii  lib 1.4.4-7etch5                         MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  lib 5.5-5                                Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  lib 0.9.8c-4etch3                        SSL shared libraries
ii  pas 1:4.0.18.1-7                         change and administer password and
ii  zli 1:1.2.3-13                           compression library - runtime

openssh-client recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



Reply to: