[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#481939: Anonymous authentication

Package: openssh-server
Version: 1:4.3p2-9etch2
Severity: minor

No easy way to do anonymous authentication.
I had designated a key as anonnoymous and published it, and with the
recent blacklisting of keys, it got blacklisted. There should be a way
to allow logins to an account designated as anonymous with any
credentials. Arrg.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages openssh-server depends on:
ii  add 3.102                                Add and remove users and groups
ii  deb 1.5.11etch1                          Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpk 1.13.25                              package maintenance system for Deb
ii  lib 2.3.6.ds1-13etch5                    GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  lib 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2etch1 common error description library
ii  lib 1.4.4-7etch5                         MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  lib 0.79-5                               Pluggable Authentication Modules f
ii  lib 0.79-5                               Runtime support for the PAM librar
ii  lib 0.79-5                               Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  lib 1.32-3                               SELinux shared libraries
ii  lib 0.9.8c-4etch3                        SSL shared libraries
ii  lib 7.6.dbs-13                           Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii  ope 0.1.1                                list of blacklisted OpenSSH RSA an
ii  ope 1:4.3p2-9etch2                       Secure shell client, an rlogin/rsh
ii  zli 1:1.2.3-13                           compression library - runtime

openssh-server recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
  ssh/new_config: true
* ssh/use_old_init_script: true
* ssh/disable_cr_auth: false

Reply to: