Bug#460136: please include armel in debian/control architecture list to guarantee selinux support
Build-Depends: libselinux1-dev [alpha amd64 arm armeb hppa i386 ia64
lpia m68k mips mipsel powerpc ppc64 s390 sparc], libgnomeui-dev (>=
2.0.0) | libgnome-dev
to which "armel" should be added.
In practice, both of the alternatives libgnome-dev and libgnomeui-dev
are available, of which -ui-dev also brings in libselinux1-dev and
-dev does not.
At present it has built on armel with libgnomeui and thus selinux was
present by chance;
With libgnome-dev installed and no libselinux1-dev, "configure" fails
for lack of selinux headers.
Does the order in which alternatives are listed imply an order of
preference when several of them are present?