Bug#349645: [CVE-2006-0225] for sarge?

To: Geoff Crompton <geoff.crompton@strategicdata.com.au>, 349645@bugs.debian.org, security@debian.org
Subject: Bug#349645: [CVE-2006-0225] for sarge?
From: Justin Pryzby <justinpryzby@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:15:23 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060517131523.GA23706@andromeda>
Reply-to: Justin Pryzby <justinpryzby@users.sourceforge.net>, 349645@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 446AA5F9.1000401@strategicdata.com.au>
References: <[🔎] 446AA5F9.1000401@strategicdata.com.au>

On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:26:33PM +1000, Geoff Crompton wrote:
> Is this considered important enough for a DSA for sarge?
That is a question best addressed to the security team

Justin

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#349645: [CVE-2006-0225] for sarge?
  - From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>

References:
- Bug#349645: [CVE-2006-0225] for sarge?
  - From: Geoff Crompton <geoff.crompton@strategicdata.com.au>

Prev by Date: Bug#349645: [CVE-2006-0225] for sarge?
Next by Date: splendiferous Hussy in hard fuckiing.
Previous by thread: Bug#349645: [CVE-2006-0225] for sarge?
Next by thread: Bug#349645: [CVE-2006-0225] for sarge?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread