AW: Unidentified subject!
Helo
Im Rolf Kisters and I've seen this message, but I dont write it !!!
Ich search through the logfiles, but there's no log about this Mail.
What's wrong ?
- Rolf
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Rolf Kisters
> Gesendet: Samstag, 6. April 2002 09:48
> An: debian-ssh@lists.debian.org
> Betreff: Unidentified subject!
>
>
> <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Fri Apr 5 21:13:27 2002
> X-Envelope-Sender: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
> Received: (qmail 1869 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2002 03:13:25 -0000
> Received: from yue.hongo.wide.ad.jp (root@203.178.139.94)
> by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2002 03:13:25 -0000
> Received: from localhost (yoshfuji@localhost [127.0.0.1])
> by yue.hongo.wide.ad.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/8.9.3/Debian
> 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id MAA06554;
> Sat, 6 Apr 2002 12:13:07 +0900
> To: djm@mindrot.org
> Cc: matthew@debian.org, wichert@wiggy.net,
> debian-ipv6@lists.debian.org,
> debian-ssh@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: IPv6 support
> In-Reply-To:
> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.44.0204061057390.1260-100000@mothra.mindrot.org>
> References: <20020302134214W.yoshfuji@wide.ad.jp>
> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.44.0204061057390.1260-100000@mothra.mindrot.org>
> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.1 (AOI)
> Sender: "Hideaki YOSHIFUJI" <yoshfuji@cerberus.hongo.wide.ad.jp>
> X-URL: http://www.yoshifuji.org/%7Ehideaki/
> X-Fingerprint: 90 22 65 EB 1E CF 3A D1 0B DF 80 D8 48 07 F8
> 94 E0 62 0E EA
> X-PGP-Key-URL:
> http://www.yoshifuji.org/%7Ehideaki/hideaki@yoshifuji.org.asc
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Message-Id: <20020406121307E.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
> Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 12:13:07 +0900
> From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?=
> <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
> X-Dispatcher: imput version 991025(IM133)
> Lines: 41
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.7 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.01
>
> In article
> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.44.0204061057390.1260-100000@mothra.mindrot.org>
> (at Sat, 6 Apr 2002 11:02:29 +1000 (EST)), Damien Miller
> <djm@mindrot.org> says:
>
> > On Sat, 2 Mar 2002, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp]
> 吉藤英明 wrote:
> >
> > > Please apply this fix (against openssh-3.0.2p1) to suppress an
> > > "error" message which have people confused because it is
> a warning
> > > in fact.
> >
> > I would prefer to make the test still more specific - could it check
> > for EINVAL returns from bind() only?
>
> It is ok to ignore the "error" if bind(2) for ipv4 socket returns
> EADDRINUSE error when you have ipv6 socket bound.
> Similarly, it is ok to ignore the "error" if bind(2) for ipv6 socket
> returns EADDRINUSE error when you have ipv4 socket bound.
>
> The loop trys only for ipv4 and ipv6 socket. So, this compiles to:
> It is ok to ignore the "error" if bind(2) for a socket returns
> EADDRINUSE error then you have another socket bound.
>
> We may need to check IPV6_V6ONLY socket option support.
> If IPV6_V6ONLY is defined, set IPV6_V6ONLY option to (int)1
> for ipv6 socket to have ipv4 bound. And, above "error" is
> a real error if IPV6_V6ONLY is defined and supported (setsockopt()
> succeeded).
>
>
> summary:
> 0. let v4inv6 0 outside the loop.
> 1. set IPV6_V6ONLY for ipv6 socket before bind(2) if it is defined.
> if IPV6_V6ONLY is defined and setsockopt() failed, warn it.
> if IPV6_V6ONLY is defined and setsockopt() succeeded, let
> v4inv6 1.
>
> 2. if bind(2) for an socket (either for ipv4 or ipv6) failed
> when you
> already have socket (it is either ipv6 or ipv4,
> respectively because the
> loop trys only for ipv4 and/or ipv6) and the reason is
> EADDRINUSE and
> v4inv6 is 0, it is ok to ignore this "error."
>
> --
> Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
> GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ssh-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ssh-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: