Re: Regression in 028abd92 for Sun UltraSPARC T1
On 23.03.21 17:57, Christoph Hellwig wrote:> Frank, can you double check
67e306c6906137020267eb9bbdbc127034da3627 really still works, and
only 028abd9222df0cf5855dab5014a5ebaf06f90565 broke your setup?
So I manually checked out both 67e306c6906137020267eb9bbdbc127034da3627
and 028abd9222df0cf5855dab5014a5ebaf06f90565 and recompiled both (doing
`make [...] mrproper` before each run).
The results didn't change from the ones from the bisecting process:
...is working and:
...is broken on my T1000.
As I don't know how big attachments can be on this list, I put the logs
A log for 028abd9222df is here:
A log for 67e306c69061 is here: