[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 2020-04-19 debian-10.0-sparc64 NETINST working fine sort of but libc6-dev ???



On 21 Apr 2020, at 19:18, Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org> wrote:
> On 2020-04-21 14:06, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> On 4/21/20 8:01 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>> Looks like a version problem :
>>> 
>>> 
>>> phobos# apt-get install libc6-dev
>>> Reading package lists... Done
>>> Building dependency tree
>>> Reading state information... Done
>>> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
>>> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
>>> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
>>> or been moved out of Incoming.
>>> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>>> 
>>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>>>  libc6-dev : Depends: libc6 (= 2.30-2+sparc64) but 2.31-0+sparc64 is to be installed
>>>              Depends: libc-dev-bin (= 2.30-2+sparc64) but it is not going to be installed
>>> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
>> Try:
>> # apt install libc6-dev=2.31-0+sparc64
>> Adrian
> 
> hrmmmm ... seems to not exist :
> 
> phobos#
> phobos# apt install libc6-dev=2.31-0+sparc64
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> E: Version '2.31-0+sparc64' for 'libc6-dev' was not found
> phobos#

This is your problem:

> I don't quite know what the above problems are and so I may strip down
> the /etc/apt/sources.list to a one liner.
> 
> root@phobos:~# cp -p /etc/apt/sources.list  /etc/apt/sources.list.orig
> root@phobos:~#
> root@phobos:~# vi /etc/apt/sources.list
> root@phobos:~#
> root@phobos:~#
> root@phobos:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
> # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.0 _Sid_ - Unofficial sparc64 NETINST 20200419-15:32]/ sid main
> 
> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-ports/ sid main non-free contrib
> deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian-ports/ sid main non-free contrib

You removed the unreleased line. Don't do that.

Jess


Reply to: