Re: [RFC PATCH 0/13] sparc32: sunset sun4m and sun4d
- To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
- Cc: David S Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>, Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>, Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>, Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>, Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>, Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/13] sparc32: sunset sun4m and sun4d
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 22:41:04 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] CAK8P3a2L-AGHwszuoLKAnzY2ag_8L-iewCZ_aWxk_770w1SMqQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20201218184347.2180772-1-sam@ravnborg.org>
- References: <[🔎] 20201218184347.2180772-1-sam@ravnborg.org>
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 7:43 PM Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
>
> The sun4m and sun4d based SPARC machines was very popular in the
> 90'ties and was then replaced by the more powerful sparc64
> class of machines.
> Today there is only Gentoo that to my best knowledge supports
> sparc32 and people have moved on to more capable HW.
>
> Cobham Gaisler have variants of the LEON processer that
> runs sparc32 - and they are in production today.
>
> With this patchset I propose to sunset sun4m and sun4d and move
> focus to a more streamlined support for LEON.
>
> One downside is that qemu supports sun4m - and we may loose
> some testing possibilities when sun4m is dropped. qemu supports
> LEON to some degree - I have not yet tried it out.
>
> Andreas from Gaisler have indicated that they may be more active
> upstream on sparc32 - and this will only be easier with a kernel
> where the legacy stuff is dropped.
>
> I decided to divide up the patches to make it possible to review
> the set as some of the patches touches assembler and these parts
> could use some extra eyes if we move forward with this.
>
> For now it builds with the configurations I have tried.
Thank you for doing this, it looks like a very nice cleanup.
> Looking forward for feedback if sunsetting is a good idea or not.
I have no insight on whether there are any users left that would miss
it, but I'm fairly sure that there are lots of people that would rather
see it gone.
> Note: I dunno why git does not see floppy_64.h=>floppy.h as a rename??
It doesn't do that if the old name existed already.
Arnd
Reply to: