[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#927892: grub-ieee1275-bin: Please add bootinfo.txt for sparc and sparc64



Hi,

xorriso-wise, the debian-10.0-sparc64-grub-NETINST-1.iso looks ok:

  $ xorriso -indev debian-10.0-sparc64-grub-NETINST-1.iso \
            -report_system_area plain
  ...
  Volume id    : 'Debian 10.0 sparc64 n'
  System area options: 0x0000000c
  System area summary: SUN-SPARC-Disk-Label
  ISO image size/512 : 443640
  SUN SPARC disklabel: CD-ROM Disc with Sun sparc boot created by libisofs
  SUN SPARC secs/head: 640
  SUN SPARC heads/cyl: 1
  SUN SPARC partmap  :   N   IdTag   Perms    StartCyl   NumBlocks
  SUN SPARC partition:   1  0x0004  0x0010           0      443640
  SUN SPARC partition:   2  0x0002  0x0010           0      443640
  SUN SPARC partition:   3  0x0002  0x0010           0      443640
  SUN SPARC partition:   4  0x0002  0x0010           0      443640
  SUN SPARC partition:   5  0x0002  0x0010           0      443640
  SUN SPARC partition:   6  0x0002  0x0010           0      443640
  SUN SPARC partition:   7  0x0002  0x0010           0      443640
  SUN SPARC partition:   8  0x0002  0x0010           0      443640
  SPARC GRUB2 core   : 1748992  453104
  SPARC GRUB2 path   : /boot/core.img

xorriso reports /boot/core.img as "SPARC GRUB2 path", because it was
recognized as comming from the same disk inode as /boot/grub/core.img
and thus shares the content blocks with it:

  $ xorriso -indev debian-10.0-sparc64-grub-NETINST-1.iso \
            -find /boot/core.img -exec report_lba -- \
            -find /boot/grub/core.img -exec report_lba --
  ...
  Report layout: xt , Startlba ,   Blocks , Filesize , ISO image path
  File data lba:  0 ,      854 ,      222 ,   453104 , '/boot/core.img'
  Report layout: xt , Startlba ,   Blocks , Filesize , ISO image path
  File data lba:  0 ,      854 ,      222 ,   453104 , '/boot/grub/core.img'

So all is well. Except the nearly zero content of bytes 512 to 767 of
the ISO.


Have a nice day :)

Thomas


Reply to: