Re: kernel modules does not have signatures, so taints kernel
On 06/01/2016 02:34 PM, Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
> If module signing only for Secure Boot on EFI [2], why do we have it on sparc64?
Looks like an oversight to me. The kernels for the different architectures share
some of the configuration, so it might just be a bug that this particular option
should be set on architectures only which support SecureBoot.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Reply to: