On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 20:30 +0300, Anatoly Pugachev wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 23:13 +0300, Anatoly Pugachev wrote: > > [...] > > > Sorry for wrong feature request, please close this bug as non-valid. Thanks. > > > > I don't mind keeping it open if you're still hoping to get more > > information. > > Ben, > > below is a long description of how I made (dirty hack to n2_rng) > hardware random number generator to work in linux sparc64 LDOM. > > Can you please suggest, what to do next? Close this bugreport as > invalid, and fill new one against n2_rng module in debian, or report > first to lkml? Thanks. [...] You should send this patch upstream (linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org and sparclinux@vger.kernel.org mailing lists). But first, read Documentation/SubmittingPatches and make sure the patch is in the right format with a clear commit message and Developer's Certificate of Origin. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Q. Which is the greater problem in the world today, ignorance or apathy? A. I don't know and I couldn't care less.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part