Re: NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup
> On 25 Oct 2016, at 18:04, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: James Clarke <jrtc27@jrtc27.com>
> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:59:04 +0100
>
>> That’s basically the same as my patch, except this potentially flushes things
>> outside [start, end) if they’re not on 2^22-byte boundaries.
>
> Oh yes, I see, thanks for pointing that out.
>
> We have to take the index into account for the purposes of virtual
> address comparison.
I don’t quite follow what you’re trying to say here? idx is only used to index the TSB.
James
Reply to: