[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: State of fpc in sid


peter green wrote:
> Abou Al Montacir wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>> I've committed fixes of this bug, can you please upload?
> Just thought i'd keep you informed.
> I uploaded with my changes and your changes. I also had to make a couple of follow uploads to deal with a couple of small but build-breaking issues, i'll try and get those follow up uploads into svn soon.
> Unfortunately I wasn't quick enough with the uploads and the chroots on the sparc buildd were updated to the new binutils (which makes versions of the fpc package prior to 2.6.2-3 uninstallable) before I managed to get the new upload in. This will mean a manual build on sparc is needed. Unfortunately the sparc porterbox seems to be out of disc space at the moment and requests in #debian-sparc for someone to build it manually went unanswered. I'm currently looking into qemu and if that fails I will look into if  a sparc box I had remote access to ages ago can be made available again. I want to get this into testing ASAP to minimise the chance of problems for any derivatives that pull from testing.
> powerpc64 will also need manual building for the same reason. Since it is not an official architecture I don't plan to do that building, ccing the guy who filed the most recent ppc64 bug report to inform him of this.

I will try to build manually on ppc64.

Hiroyuki Yamamoto
A75D B285 7050 4BF9 AEDA  91AC 3A10 59C6 5203 04DC

Reply to: