[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: -lssl problem on debian sprac 64-bit



On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 10:06:17PM -0400, A E [Gmail] wrote:
> #> ./Configure linux64-sparcv9
> 
> It built it and stuff but I see no libssl.so anywhere. Where did the libs
> go? Do I need to use a different make target to build this or do I need a
> different package like openssl-dev?. Weird!

I don't know.  I use the Debian package.

> So I'm not entirely clear on what you just said. Did you mean to say that
> this IS true for amd64 or did you mean to say it's true for sparc64 and
> hence almost all libs available for Sparc64 are actually 32-bit but in all
> other cases, building software as 64-bit actually does improve performance?

amd64 is usually faster than i386, but 32-bit sparc is usually faster
than 64-bit sparc.

> Also, I have no idea what sparc32 is. Will have to do research but according
> to the community of this particular software AND the authors as well, this
> software performs far better in a 64-bit environment/arch than in 32-bit.
> So, I am relatively insistent on building it as 64-bit although IF all other
> libraries it's using (due to the fact that my system is essentially running
> 64-bit Linux with 32-bit libraries, then I won't see any performance
> improvement?

Whether you'll see any performance improvement is dependent on what the
software does.  Perhaps you will.  There are some cases where I do in my
own code.  In general, though, most people don't.  If you want to build
this software as 64-bit and Debian does not provide 64-bit versions of
those libraries, you'll have to build your own 64-bit copies by hand.
Again, whether there's any performance improvement from doing that is
dependent on the particular programs and libraries.

sparc32 tells the program you give it that the system is 32-bit.  It
does this by changing the uname -m output.

-- 
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: