Re: Bug#533601: [sparc] tcpd fails reverse name resolution

To: 533601@bugs.debian.org
Cc: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#533601: [sparc] tcpd fails reverse name resolution
From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:28:04 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20090630152804.GA8840@bongo.bofh.it>
Mail-followup-to: md@Linux.IT, 533601@bugs.debian.org, debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20090629083110.GA7872@lemon.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de>
References: <20090619083317.8463.68045.reportbug@skylla.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de> <20090619084413.GA18410@bongo.bofh.it> <20090619090118.GB3939@lemon.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de> <20090619093829.GB20650@bongo.bofh.it> <20090627235810.GA28160@bongo.bofh.it> <[🔎] 20090629083110.GA7872@lemon.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de>

On Jun 29, Hermann Lauer <Hermann.Lauer@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote:

> Probably it's ultrasparc specific, so I cc to debian sparc
> hoping somebody tell's us "It's working here".
So, does anybody still use sparc systems?

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#533601: [sparc] tcpd fails reverse name resolution
  - From: Anatoly Pugachev <mator@team.co.ru>

References:
- Re: Bug#533601: [sparc] tcpd fails reverse name resolution
  - From: Hermann Lauer <Hermann.Lauer@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#533601: [sparc] tcpd fails reverse name resolution
Next by Date: Re: Bug#533601: [sparc] tcpd fails reverse name resolution
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#533601: [sparc] tcpd fails reverse name resolution
Next by thread: Re: Bug#533601: [sparc] tcpd fails reverse name resolution
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread