Re: Interesting apt problem during update
Unfortunately this didn't solve my problem. I tried many difference
options from the apt man pages, but kept getting a libc6 (I think)
error. This is provided by apt, which can't be upgraded. I couldn't
install a 2.6 kernel without this.
My uname shows that i'm running Etch, but it's broken :-(
Chris.
On 28/10/2007, Chris Andrew <cjhandrew@gmail.com> wrote:
> That could be worth a try. Even with Etch being the end of 32-bit
> support, this could be a lifesaver.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris.
>
> On 28/10/2007, Ulrich Teichert <krypton@ulrich-teichert.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > sorry for the noise, but if another user runs into this:
> >
> > [del]
> > >Setting up apt (0.6.46.4-0.1) ...
> > >gpg: key 2D230C5F: no valid user IDs
> > >gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature
> > >gpg: key 6070D3A1: no valid user IDs
> > >gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature
> > >gpg: key ADB11277: no valid user IDs
> > >gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature
> > >gpg: key BBE55AB3: no valid user IDs
> > >gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature
> > >gpg: Total number processed: 4
> > >gpg: w/o user IDs: 4
> > >dpkg: error processing apt (--configure):
> > [del]
> >
> > The solution for me was to boot into a 2.6 kernel (even a catatonic one
> > without network support...) and:
> >
> > lian:~# dpkg --configure -a
> > Setting up apt (0.6.46.4-0.1) ...
> > gpg: key 2D230C5F: "Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (2006) <ftpmaster@debian.org>" not changed
> > gpg: key 6070D3A1: "Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch) <ftpmaster@debian.org>" not changed
> > gpg: key ADB11277: "Etch Stable Release Key <debian-release@lists.debian.org>" not changed
> > gpg: key BBE55AB3: "Debian-Volatile Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)" not changed
> > gpg: Total number processed: 4
> > gpg: unchanged: 4
> >
> > Setting up aptitude (0.4.4-4) ...
> >
> > Setting up apt-utils (0.6.46.4-0.1) ...
> >
> > Setting up libapt-pkg-dev (0.6.46.4-0.1) ...
> >
> > All was well. I would like to know *why* gpg needs a 2.6 kernel and fails
> > without giving a proper error message, though....
> >
> > HTH,
> > Uli
> > --
> > Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: Ulrich.Teichert@gmx.de
> > Stormweg 24 |listening to: Channel 13 Is Haunted (Hex Dispensers)
> > 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|Is It Good Or Is It Bad? (Opération S)
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Reasons why you may want to try GNU/Linux:
>
> http://www.getgnulinux.org/
>
> A great GNU/Linux distro:
>
> http://wiki.gnewsense.org/
>
--
Reasons why you may want to try GNU/Linux:
http://www.getgnulinux.org/
A great GNU/Linux distro:
http://wiki.gnewsense.org/
Reply to: