Re: 2.6.18-1-sparc64 regression also on SunBlade1000

["Uwe A. P. Würdinger" <wuerdinger@highspeed-firewall.de>]

Jurij Smakov schrieb:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 12:18:43PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
>   
> > Hi,
> >
> > I also noticed a regression with 2.6.18-1-sparc64, but it looks
> > different from #392078. See screenshot at
> > http://people.debian.org/~stigge/sun4u.jpg : To prevent this "Cheetah
> > error trap" ... "Irrecoverable deferred error trap", I'm using my old
> > 2.6.14-2-sparc64 kernel (didn't try sth. inbetween - considered useful?).
> >
> > How can I help here?
> >     
>
> Hi Roland,
>
> Thanks for your report. If you could figure out the last working 
> kernel, that would be very helpful.
>
> Best regards,
>   

On my Blade 100 and Blade 1000im running 
linux-image-2.6.16-2-sparc64(2.6.16-18).

Havn't noticed any problems but I run both of  'em headless without X

greets Uwe