Re: Bug #251149: gcc wrapper for sparc is chronically broken
--- "David S.Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> People can't wrap their brain around how to build a sparc64
> kernel often right now anyways, making things sparc32 by
> default isn't going to change that.
>
> The most common error is simply not having a 64-bit libc
> installed, which is needed to build and execute the kernel
> build tools that get compiled and run as part of the kernel
> build.
About this topic, how can I check a kernel to see whether I built it in
64-bit or 32-bit mode? All of these technicalities make me unsure which
sort of kernel I compiled. Now I'm doubting whether I built it right
after all.
Reply to: