Re: __alloc_pages: 2-order allocation failed

To: Mike Edwards <sauron-debian-sparc@psychology.rutgers.edu>
Cc: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: __alloc_pages: 2-order allocation failed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:43:10 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050419114310.7f8fdb49.davem@davemloft.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050419143452.GB16291@psychology.rutgers.edu>
References: <20050328230658.GB26913@psychology.rutgers.edu> <20050329085818.GC7727@sv.lnf.it> <20050329184310.GD3903@psychology> <20050329120704.366b47ae.davem@davemloft.net> <20050330225858.GF26913@psychology.rutgers.edu> <20050330151724.296f9ac3.davem@davemloft.net> <20050331000117.GJ3903@psychology> <20050330162518.4a71953a.davem@davemloft.net> <20050331194245.GD10263@psychology.rutgers.edu> <20050331114936.5de0efa9.davem@davemloft.net> <[🔎] 20050419143452.GB16291@psychology.rutgers.edu>

On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:34:52 -0400
Mike Edwards <sauron-debian-sparc@psychology.rutgers.edu> wrote:

> __alloc_pages: 1-order allocation failed (gfp=0x20/0)
> __alloc_pages: task(spamc) pid(15858) caller(000000000046ed98)

What symbols in the System.map of this kernel are near the
0x46ed98 address being output?  It will solve the puzzle.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: __alloc_pages: 2-order allocation failed
  - From: Mike Edwards <sauron-debian-sparc@psychology.rutgers.edu>

References:
- Re: __alloc_pages: 2-order allocation failed
  - From: Mike Edwards <sauron-debian-sparc@psychology.rutgers.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: __alloc_pages: 2-order allocation failed
Next by Date: Re: rtc and chrony on Ultra 1 and Ultra 5
Previous by thread: Re: __alloc_pages: 2-order allocation failed
Next by thread: Re: __alloc_pages: 2-order allocation failed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread