[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: X11 crashing on 2.4.28



At Thu, 02 Dec 2004 13:45:59 -0500,
Ron Murray wrote:

> > Anyone fancy compiling a new xserver binary?
> > 
> 
>    I'll set one going before I leave work this afternoon. Should have
> completed by tomorrow morning.
> 

   We have a minor problem. Richard's patch seems to refer to a
pristine xfree86-4.3.0 source. When I came to check the patch location
on a build tree that had had the Debian patches applied, I found it to
be quite different. Specifically, the line Richard wanted to change
was now

#   if defined(linux) || defined(__OpenBSD__)

instead of 

#   if defined(linux) && defined(__ia64__) || defined(__OpenBSD__)

   Clearly, there's a Debian patch involved here. I found it at
debian/patches/071_nonexecutable_malloced_mem.diff

and it goes:

> $Id: 071_nonexecutable_malloced_mem.diff 1044 2004-02-16 17:40:33Z branden $
> 
> This patch fixes the assumption that data returned by malloc() is
> executable.  In upstream revision 1.43, the assumption was fixed for
> ia64 only.  We understand it is Linus' position that programs that
> assume data to be executable are broken, so we enable this code for
> all Linux platforms.
> 
> Original patch (before upstream applied its own version) was by David
> Mosberger.
> diff -urN xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loader/elfloader.c
> xc.new/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loader/elfloader.c
> --- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loader/elfloader.c   2004-02-07
> 17:33:29.000000000 -0500
> +++ xc.new/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loader/elfloader.c
> 2004-02-07 17:29:03.000000000 -0500
> @@ -957,7 +957,7 @@
>             ErrorF( "ELFCreateGOT() Unable to reallocate memory!!!!\n"
> );
>             return FALSE;
>         }
> -#   if defined(linux) && defined(__ia64__) || defined(__OpenBSD__)
> +#   if defined(linux) || defined(__OpenBSD__)
>         {   
>             unsigned long page_size = getpagesize();
>             unsigned long round;

   ... which would indicate that Richard's suggestion is already in
the current Debian package. I'd made a build log when I built the
package here, and I have

> Applying patch debian/patches/071_nonexecutable_malloced_mem.diff ... successful.

   in it, so I'm sure it's in the build. 

   Richard, does this look likely? Are there any other places that
could stuff up the exec bit?

 .....Ron

--
Ron Murray   (rjmx@rjmx.net)
http://www.rjmx.net/~ron
GPG Public Key Fingerprint: F2C1 FC47 5EF7 0317 133C  D66B 8ADA A3C4 D86C 74DE



Reply to: