[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: proposed silo NMU



On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:07:52PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Bug-submitters: please see if
> http://people.debian.org/~blarson/sarge-sparc-siloNMU-netinst.iso
> (based on 2004-10-23 daily build, only silo for booting cd changed,
> still installs released version) works on your system, and if a recent
> daily d-i build does also.  If the first works and the second doesn't,
> 
> I'll NMU if this fixes the problem and the maintainer does not object.
[...]
> +silo (1.4.8-1-0.1) unstable; urgency=high
> +
> +  * NMU for RC bugs
> +  * Change debian/rules to explicitly use gcc 2.95
> +    (Hopefully Closes: #261824, #264728, #267791)
> +  * Strange version number due to mainainter using non-native style
> +    version number on native package.
> +  * Fix missing build-depends on sparcutils (Closes: #278126)
> +  
> + -- Blars Blarson <blarson@blars.org>  Sun, 24 Oct 2004 16:53:24 -0700
> +
>  silo (1.4.8-1) unstable; urgency=high

Please don't number the NMU that way.  1.4.8-1.1 should suffice.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |     Don't use nuclear weapons to
Debian GNU/Linux                   |     troubleshoot faults.
branden@debian.org                 |     -- US Air Force Instruction 91-111
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: