Re: Bug#248986: Installation report of Sarge Beta 4 on sparc
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 08:47:45PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 02:06:02PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > So SILO doesn't have a message like:
> >
> > Loading initial ramdisk <bytes> size (at <addr> phys, <addr> virt)
>
> Humpf, it was booting from hard disk.....
> I have this:
> Loading inital ramdisk (1821913 bytes at 0x6000000)...
Then you don't have the new second.b, and I've no idea where it is
getting 0x6000000. That's not from my sources. The virtual address is
hardcoded to 0x40c00000.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
Reply to: