Re: kernel-package sparc confusion
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 11:44:53 -0500, Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> said:
> This looks good, except that checking the filter for sparc64% and
> equal to sparc64 is redundant. The only reason for it is to detect
> things like sparc64-smp, which will match the filter just like
> sparc64 will. So something like this:
> ifneq (,$(filter sparc64%,$(KPKG_SUBARCH)))
> KERNEL_ARCH = sparc64
> else
> ifneq (,$(filter sparc%,$(KPKG_SUBARCH)))
> KERNEL_ARCH = sparc
> else
> KERNEL_ARCH = $(strip $(shell uname -m))
> endif
> endif
> So the logic speaks, if it starts with sparc64, make it that. If it
> starts with sparc, make it just sparc, otherwise fallback on uname
> -m. This is for people that like doing subarch=ultrasparcIII or
> something.
OK. This is going into the new version.
manoj
--
When fear admits no hope of safety, Necessity makes dastards valiant
men. -- Herrick
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: