Re: kernel-package sparc confusion
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 12:40:59PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 11:37:18 -0400, Rob Radez <rob@osinvestor.com> said:
>
> > Howdy, The not-so-recent changes in kernel-package to allow easier
> > cross-compiling of sparc64 from a sparc32 appear to have changed the
> > default KPKG_SUBARCH value from sparc32 to sparc64. I'm using the
> > following hack to /usr/share/kernel-package/rules which appears to
> > be working to not set KPKG_SUBARCH unless it's explicitly wanted.
> > I'm not exactly sure what the correct fix is, though.
>
> Umm, I would be uncomfortable with this fix. The right thing
> to do would be to set KPKG_SUBARCH appropriately, no?
The logic I wanted was, if KPKG_SUBARCH is set, leave it. If it is
unset, set it according to "uname -m" (that is sparc32 for "uname ==
sparc" and sparc64 for "uname == sparc64").
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
Reply to: