Re: cannot find sparc64.gz
> Old-Return-Path: <bmc@phunnypharm.org>
> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 09:09:24 -0400
> From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
> Cc: Antonello <etn@libero.it>, debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Sender: Ben Collins <bmc@phunnypharm.org>
> X-Spam-Level:
> Resent-From: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
> X-Mailing-List: <debian-sparc@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/12767
> X-Loop: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
> Resent-Sender: debian-sparc-request@lists.debian.org
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.20
> X-Spam-Level:
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:15:50PM +0100, Dave Love wrote:
> > Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> writes:
> >
> > > Bitten by the 64-bitness default of gcc.
> >
> > Why does it have a surprising default now?
>
> If you uninstall libc6-sparc64, it will be the same as it used to be.
> Now, it checks "uname=sparc64 && -f /usr/lib64/libc.so", and it defaults
> to -m64, otherwise it defaults to -m32.
>
I thought it was going to decide based on libgcc.a instead of libc.so?
James A. Morrison
Reply to: