[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#203324: unreproducible?



On Wed, 2003-08-06 12:43:45 -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk <kurt@csh.rit.edu>
wrote in message <[🔎] Pine.GSO.4.53.0308061241580.19008@fury.csh.rit.edu>:
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Ben Collins wrote:
> Will sarge ever support at least the sun4m-softmul people, or will
> they be stuck with woody from now on?

i386 seems to be just dieing, so why shouldn't we let other archs go to
dust, too? This bug, too, smells like it's some gcc doing more
optimization (read: using opcodes which are not in all CPUs of a given
class) like the LOCKed XADD on i386...

PLEASE don't start breaking archs by doing some optimization here and
there. Thanks.

MfG, JBG

-- 
   Jan-Benedict Glaw       jbglaw@lug-owl.de    . +49-172-7608481
   "Eine Freie Meinung in  einem Freien Kopf    | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
    fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! |   im Irak!
      ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(IRAQ_WAR_2 | DRM | TCPA));

Attachment: pgpzv72RhZJA_.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: