Re: Bug#91859: can't reproduce
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 05:27:34PM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> cm@tahina.priv.at (christian mock) writes:
>
> > I'll build my local version now, but could you escalate this to
> > either the dump maintainer or somebody responsible for the sparc
> > build process, or whatever are the right steps?
>
> I maintain dump too. :-) From the upstream changelog:
>
> Changes between versions 0.4b10 and 0.4b11 (released December 5, 1999)
> ======================================================================
>
> 2. Added a 'S' option to dump which determines the amount of space
> that is needed to perform the dump without actually doing it, similar
> to the Sun's ufsdump 'S' option. Patch contributed by Rob Cermak
> <cermak@ahab.rutgers.edu>.
>
> I suppose this means that I could/should add a versioned build dependency
> on dump, but as that's a fairly old version, I suspect the auto-builds of
> the new amanda I just uploaded will fix it since the sparc buildd is using
> a chroot'ed build environment now, and is likely to satisfy the amanda build
> dependency with a current version of dump at build time.
>
> I'll CC the debian-sparc list, in the hopes that someone involved with the
> buildd for sparc will take a second to make sure sparc isn't relying on some
> ancient version of dump I don't want to know about... :-)
Should be fine :)
--
-----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` bcollins@debian.org -- bcollins@openldap.org -- bcollins@linux.com '
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
Reply to: