Re: Sparc Samba security update problem?
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> Yeah, it was broken once. Wichert just didn't pay attention to vore's
> motd, so he didn't know how to access it properly. Also note, that the
> only thing on auric that is from unstable is tetex.
Bah, I just don't consider the motd a good place for announcements
like that. 99.9999% of the time a motd is useless so I circumvent them
using hushlogins. If you had posted the change to debian-devel-announce
I would have been aware of it.
Wichert.
--
________________________________________________________________
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| wichert@cistron.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: