Re: Bug#91859: can't reproduce

[Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>]

cm@tahina.priv.at (christian mock) writes:

> I'll build my local version now, but could you escalate this to 
> either the dump maintainer or somebody responsible for the sparc 
> build process, or whatever are the right steps?

I maintain dump too.  :-)  From the upstream changelog:

Changes between versions 0.4b10 and 0.4b11 (released December 5, 1999)
======================================================================

2.      Added a 'S' option to dump which determines the amount of space
        that is needed to perform the dump without actually doing it, similar
        to the Sun's ufsdump 'S' option. Patch contributed by Rob Cermak
        <cermak@ahab.rutgers.edu>.

I suppose this means that I could/should add a versioned build dependency 
on dump, but as that's a fairly old version, I suspect the auto-builds of
the new amanda I just uploaded will fix it since the sparc buildd is using
a chroot'ed build environment now, and is likely to satisfy the amanda build
dependency with a current version of dump at build time.

I'll CC the debian-sparc list, in the hopes that someone involved with the
buildd for sparc will take a second to make sure sparc isn't relying on some
ancient version of dump I don't want to know about...  :-)

Bdale