Re: unstability of woody ...
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 04:22:37PM -0300, Esteban Osses A. Mag. 2000 wrote:
>
> hi, i'm using potato on a ultra5 and i'd like to try woody ...
>
> does anybody had a bad experience with it ???
> something to have in count when upgrading ???
> thinking that woody is (defined as) the unstable version ????
Woody is unstable. If you currently enjoy a problem free system, and have
no specific reason for using woody, I suggest you stick with potato. There
may not be any problems now (there might be, but I don't know all of the
details), but sooner or later shit will hit the fan. If you don't know
enough about system recovery, you may be screwed.
Ben
--
-----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` bcollins@debian.org -- bcollins@openldap.org -- bcollins@linux.com '
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
Reply to: