Re: More glibc 2.1.1 stuff
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 04:25:01PM +0000, Steve Dunham wrote:
> There were a few differences: They have nothing resembling our
> sigaction, and sigstack patches (are they still needed?) They have an
> additional "libio-vfork" patch, which may fix our problems with
> non-cvs kernels (I'm not sure, but I've attached it so you can look at
> it). Another difference is that RH is using glibc-990329.tar.gz as a
> base and we are using glibc-19990406.tar.gz.
Yeah, the -0.2 broke a few things for me too. I've tries without the
sigaction and sigstack patches, with no changes in brokeness.
> One other, general note. The RedHat ncsd init script doesn't start it
> on 2.0 kernels, they say that it won't run on kernels older than 2.2.0
> because of threading problems.
I'll let him know about that so he can add it for us.
The vfork patch sounds like what we need. I'll give it a try.
--
----- -- - -------- --------- ---- ------- ----- - - --- --------
Ben Collins <b.m.collins@larc.nasa.gov> Debian GNU/Linux
OpenLDAP Core - bcollins@openldap.org bcollins@debian.org
UnixGroup Admin - Jordan Systems The Choice of the GNU Generation
------ -- ----- - - ------- ------- -- ---- - -------- - --- ---- - --
Reply to: