Re: glibc 2.1.1 linking problems
Ben Collins <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 1999 at 07:12:29PM -0400, Steve Dunham wrote:
> > It's your favorite debian developer again. :)
> > Your glibc "chown" hack has one minor problem: Old libraries which
> > reference "chown@@GLIBC_2.1" won't link (compile time) with the new
> > libc. (The load-time linking works fine.)
> Interesting, I hadn't noticed it really.
> > This probably isn't too give us _too_ much trouble, but the following
> > will have to be recompiled:
> > libguile.so.3
> > libguile.so.4.0.0
> > libpwdb.so.0.54
> > librpm.so.1.0
> > libtck8.0.so.1
> Ok, this will not be too hard once I finish setting up the permanent
> wanna-build/buildd for sparc. So does compiling with this egcs/glibc
> still run on RedHat?
I don't have a RH box to check this at the moment, but I doubt there
is a problem. The problem that I referred to was the RH binaries
wouldn't run on Debian, because of a missing register_frame_info
symbol in our libc. But apparently our libc now has this symbol, so
there shouldn't be a problem.